[CentOS] CentOS 8 future
John R. Dennison
jrd at gerdesas.comSat Dec 12 03:01:49 UTC 2020
- Previous message: [CentOS] CentOS 8 future
- Next message: [CentOS] CentOS 8 future
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 09:51:05PM -0500, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > I'm most disappointed with the silence from Karanbir and friends. > Obviously their Red Hat salary is more important to them than keeping > CentOS the way it was. :-( Yes, far be it from people to worry about putting food on their children's table during a pandemic. Your mistake, along with that of many, is thinking the Board had a choice in any of this. So what, exactly, do you expect Singh or others to say? What, if anything, could they say that would make you feel better about this? John -- <@rattle> I am fully confident that the cisco feature train is maintained by a schizophrenic sadist. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20201211/7c91bad5/attachment.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] CentOS 8 future
- Next message: [CentOS] CentOS 8 future
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list