On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 06:02:37PM +0000, James Pearson wrote: > why don't they just make RHEL available to all for 'free', and you just > pay for support if you need it - i.e. a bit like it is now, RHEL if you > pay, CentOS if you don't - I'm sure that would make everyone happy :-) Because RHEL's value proposition is not merely support, and the value of subscription goes way beyond that. Butttttt, that said: yes, this really is the direction things are going with expanded access to low-cost/no-cost RHEL. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm at fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader