[CentOS] [OT] Bacula offsite replication

Thu Jul 2 13:28:29 UTC 2020
Alessandro Baggi <alessandro.baggi at gmail.com>

Il 02/07/20 15:02, Valeri Galtsev ha scritto:
> On 7/2/20 3:22 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
>> Il 01/07/20 17:13, Leroy Tennison ha scritto:
>>> I realize this shouldn't happen, the file is a tgz and isn't being 
>>> modified while being transmitted.  This has happened maybe three 
>>> times this year and unfortunately I've just had to deal with it 
>>> rather than invest the time to do the research.
>>> Harriscomputer
>>> Leroy Tennison
>>> Network Information/Cyber Security Sp
>> Hi Leroy,
>> I think that in my case I could not use a tgz archive. I'm speaking 
>> about full backups that reach 600/700GiB, compressing them and then 
>> rsync them could take so much time that it will be useless.
> unless you use tape (of that high capacity), it is advantageous to 
> restrict volume size to, say, 50GB. Then when you restore, search for 
> specific files will be faster. And it will help your backup volumes 
> transfers as well.
> Valeri

Hi Valeri,

thank you for your suggestion.

Is bacula the right backup system when I need to replicate data offsite? 
There are other backup solution that simplify this process?

Thank you in advance