but the build process should be the same, no? I can't believe RH would use a completely different build process for the release than for the beta/development stuff. On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 5:36 PM Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > On 21/06/20 9:15 am, John Pierce wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 4:08 AM Tom Bishop <bishoptf at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> +1 Streams is not for a production workload, if I wanted that I can > easily > >> deploy an Arch instance if I want or need a rolling distro (it's not > Redhat > >> etc but still). If Redhat wanted CentOS to be released near the same > time > >> line they could help make that happen, although that wouldn't be in > there > >> best financial interest. > > > > > > think of it this way ... when the rolling beta is done, the final release > > will be done with no further delay. > > No, Stream and the core OS are built form a completely separate set of > sources. I highly doubt that we could use binaries built from stream to > populate the final release. The whole thing has to be rebuilt for the > final release regardless of the status of Stream. > > > Peter > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- -john r pierce recycling used bits in santa cruz