> On 21/06/20 1:23 pm, John Pierce wrote: >> but the build process should be the same, no? I can't believe RH >> would >> use a completely different build process for the release than for the >> beta/development stuff. > > The packages still have to be built as a whole, they need to go through > QA testing, isos need to be built and tested. The only thing that I can > think of that Stream benefits this process is to help Red Hat find the > odd bug here and there before their final release (after which CentOS > still has to do everything listed above). As I understand it the whole full build and QA and whatever may still be done again. The big difference is that the whole work of how to build and setting up the build infrastructure has already been done and is known and tested. So the complete build is going quite fast and the big delays are a thing of the past. If it's going to be like that it sounds very good. Regards, Simon