[CentOS] almalinux?

Wed Apr 7 14:37:11 UTC 2021
Tom Bishop <bishoptf at gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 7, 2021, 9:11 AM Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote:

> On 4/5/21 1:42 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> >
> > On 4/5/21 12:55 PM, Ruslanas Gžibovskis wrote:
> >> Also maintained by business unit, which might impact later changes
> >> when you
> >> tight your prod to it.
> >
> > A major part of the announcement videocast was about the formation of
> > the 501c6 non-profit foundation that will back the distro. While it does
> > indeed appear that everyone *currently* working on it works for
> > CloudLinux it was also clear that their longer-term intention is to have
> > the Alma Foundation be completely independent.
> >
> > Yeah, I know, I shouldn't be promoting the "other team," but I don't see
> > them that way, and I would not want this list to be a source of any
> > misinformation about them.
> >
>
> Rich .. I agree .. I don't see Igor and company as the other team either.
>
> I wished the almalinux team well on their launch day on reddit.  This is
> because I know many of the people involved in CloudLinux and I have met
> them plenty of times at cPanel conferences and other places.  I trust
> Igor and his team.
>
> I personally feel that CentOS Stream is a great distro and once you guys
> actually see it in practice with all the engineering effort and
> community involvement working as envisioned, you will like it and it
> will meet your needs.
>
> In my post I said as much about CentOS Stream .. but also IF you still
> want to do a downstream and not slightly upstream build of EL source
> code, I definitely would look at AlmaLinux.
>
> Here is a link to my post:
>
>
> https://www.reddit.com/r/AlmaLinux/comments/mgic42/congrats_on_almalinux_release/
>
> My ultimate goal is to make CentOS Stream the most used community
> distribution in the world .. but, in doing that there is no need to be
> negative toward AlmaLinux.
>
> Thanks,
> Johnny Hughes
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

>
>

+1 agree, thanks for the additional information and staying positive in
regards to other alternatives.