Am 05.02.21 um 18:20 schrieb Lamar Owen: > On 2/5/21 11:32 AM, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> On Thu, 4 Feb 2021, Warren Young wrote: >> >>> ... >>> 1. The package names are often different, and not always differing by an >>> obvious translation rule. ... >> >> Yep!! It is a pita when trying to get things running for the first time. >> I started this journey on a couple samba DC's before the Red Hat >> announcement. >> Libraries are almost always different names but even common packages >> like dhcp >> and bind have different names, configuration files and commands to do >> the same >> thing. Most of it is not that hard to figure out but it does take time >> to do it and it is a lot more work than going from CentOS 7 to CentOS 8. >> ... > > > Maybe I'm just weird, but I don't find naming differences to be big > differences. Like I keep telling optical astronomers, radio astronomy > is just observing at another wavelength; I get a lot of mean looks when > I say that, too. It's all light, why are humans so special that our > three sensory passbands centered around 450nm, 540nm, and 575nm should > be so important? Why is the 400nm-700nm band more important than say > 1000nm to 1700nm other than human eyes' sensitivities? Package naming > is syntactic sugar, no more and no less, IMHO. There is a small peak around 437+-2nm that has an impact on your eyes (photochemical risk). I would take care of this 5nm band! -- Leon :-)