Good. At least I can consider moving to that without fear of RH pulling the plug! > On 22 Jan 2021, at 20:39, Marc Balmer via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > > >> Am 22.01.2021 um 21:36 schrieb Jamie Burchell <mail at jamieburchell.com>: >> >> Can RH put a stop to projects like Rocky Linux? > > No. > >> >>>>> On 22 Jan 2021, at 18:04, Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 07:25:04AM -0500, Konstantin Boyandin via CentOS wrote: >>>>> I wonder whether RH plan to fight back FUD they've brought upon by their >>>>> December announcement. >>> >>> I mean.... really the only thing we can do is live up to the given plan with >>> Stream and RHEL options, which as far as I can see is exactly what's >>> happening. >>> >>>> Personally, I found this "no-cost" promise lacking substantial details. >>> >>> This is just the announcement of it, of course. The full details will be >>> there when the whole thing is launched, which the announcement says will be >>> very soon. >>> >>> >>>> If RH doesn't verify everyone requesting developer subscription (forcing >>>> to prove identity), the 16 installations limit is easily circumvented by >>>> multiple registrations. >>> >>> There are always going to be cheaters. Don't be one of them. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthew Miller >>> <mattdm at fedoraproject.org> >>> Fedora Project Leader >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CentOS mailing list >>> CentOS at centos.org >>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS at centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos