On 23.01.2021 01:04, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 07:25:04AM -0500, Konstantin Boyandin via CentOS wrote: >> I wonder whether RH plan to fight back FUD they've brought upon by their >> December announcement. > > I mean.... really the only thing we can do is live up to the given plan with > Stream and RHEL options, which as far as I can see is exactly what's > happening. Well, I did whatever look best to move on, for the assets I am responsible for. >> Personally, I found this "no-cost" promise lacking substantial details. > > This is just the announcement of it, of course. The full details will be > there when the whole thing is launched, which the announcement says will be > very soon. I will subscribe to it, to keep being updated. After all, I am curious about the consequences. >> If RH doesn't verify everyone requesting developer subscription (forcing >> to prove identity), the 16 installations limit is easily circumvented by >> multiple registrations. > > There are always going to be cheaters. Don't be one of them. Sure thing. I also do solemnly swear that I will faithfully abide by corresponding licenses, copyright laws and other related legal words of power. -- Sincerely, Konstantin Boyandin system administrator (ProWide Labs Ltd. - IPHost Network Monitor)