On 8/7/2021 5:46 μ.μ., Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > Μaybe "we" could fill this gap? Describe this state of EPEL? Did you > requested such missing packages? From the early on (EL8.0) I requested > such EPEL packages, some fedora maintainers branched there packages into > EPEL8. Even a request for a devel package was honored and the rpm was > included by RH later in 8.1. This is a community, so communicate! > Everything else is a product in ready state that must be paid. +1 In a lot of circumstances we do not invest a bit of time to participate in such community joint efforts and this has a significant cost for all of us in the long run. Let's all be more active in our communities if we want them to remain strong, as Leon suggests. Cheers, Nick