Il 2021-07-08 23:21 J. Adam Craig ha scritto: > Well said. It is worth pointing out also that, while Kurtzer and other > Rocky community leads are devoted to keeping Rocky 1:1 with upstream, > they > are also committed to engaging with the CentOS Stream community > themselves > (if they find a bug in upstream code and they can fix it, Kurtzer and > others have stated multiple times that they will contribute the fix > into > Stream), and to encouraging such engagement among those who desire to > see > improvements with upstream. In other words, if we are uncomfortable > with > the direction Stream is going, the preferred approach is mobilisation > within and engagement with the Stream community to have those changes > realised there, so that they flow into Enterprise Linux and everyone > benefits. While I fully understand & agree on the motivation for keeping Rocky (and other clones) 1:1 with Red Hat, it should be understood that current RHEL packages selection itself is drifting away from small/medium business needs. So the core issue is a more fundamental one: Red Hat, our upstream, is walking away from traditional server needs. So while I wish Rocky all the best (and I am actively using it!), I am looking toward Ubuntu and Debian for new deployments. Regards. -- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it email: g.danti at assyoma.it - info at assyoma.it GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8