Il 2021-07-09 13:57 Nikolaos Milas ha scritto: > On 9/7/2021 1:14 μ.μ., Gionatan Danti wrote: > >> While I fully understand & agree on the motivation for keeping Rocky >> (and other clones) 1:1 with Red Hat, it should be understood that >> current RHEL packages selection itself is drifting away from >> small/medium business needs. So the core issue is a more fundamental >> one: Red Hat, our upstream, is walking away from traditional server >> needs. > > IMHO, this is a more fundamental discussion, which is beyond future > CentOS versions and alternative RHEL-compatible projects and it > deserves a separate thread. Sure. > In any case, I think that the existence and continuous availability / > maintenance of external RHEL / CentOS-compatible repositories probably > provides a solution for most use scenarios. Of course, I cannot > possibly know all actual needs, so I may be wrong. > > I need to recognize the fact that it appears there is still a shortage > of packages for CentOS 8, even though it is active for quite long > already. Maybe this is mainly due to EPEL difficulties. This is my impression also. Regards. -- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it email: g.danti at assyoma.it - info at assyoma.it GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8