On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 5:14 AM Gionatan Danti <g.danti at assyoma.it> wrote: > While I fully understand & agree on the motivation for keeping Rocky > (and other clones) 1:1 with Red Hat, it should be understood that > current RHEL packages selection itself is drifting away from > small/medium business needs. So the core issue is a more fundamental > one: Red Hat, our upstream, is walking away from traditional server > needs. > > So while I wish Rocky all the best (and I am actively using it!), I am > looking toward Ubuntu and Debian for new deployments. > Regards. > Any extensions beyond rebuilding TUV provided code are why CentOS, and now Rocky, have SIGs. There is an appropriate place for these requests, but it is not in the main project. https://git.rockylinux.org/sig