[CentOS] Microsoft Teams on CentOS 7. Does the latest version work?

Fri Jul 16 11:13:27 UTC 2021
Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>

On 16.07.21 12:39, Simon Matter wrote:
>> On 16/07/21 10:19 pm, Simon Matter wrote:
>>>> I think you missed from a different post where the package was created
>>>> by a different 3rd-party, not google.  So how else would you expect the
>>>> 3rd-party package to satisfy the dependency?
>>> I didn't say the chrome packages came from google. But, the TO has some
>>> chrome RPM installed which "provides" the libstdc++ version required by
>>> teams, but doesn't really provide this libstdc++ version to the whole
>>> system. That's why the RPM is broken, it claims to provide a libstdc++
>>> version which it doesn't really provide.
>> And I ask again, how else would you expect the package to satisfy the
>> dependency in chrome for the newer libstdc++?  The package was
>> explicitly created to allow chrome to run on an older system that
>> doesn't have the newer libstdc++, by rights it should work with other
>> programs that need a newer libstdc++ as well provided that they set
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH appropriately.  So it does, in fact, provide the stated
>> dependency for the entire system, you just have to tell programs that
>> need it where to find it.
> And that's where it breaks the rules! It "provides" something that it
> doesn't really provide. That's NOT allowed with RPM because it breaks
> other applications. It breaks the whole meaning of dependency tracking of
> the RPM system. That's why the mentioned chrome package has to be
> considered broken.

$ LANG=C rpm -qp --provides 
Header V4 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 7fac5991: NOKEY
google-chrome = 91.0.4472.164
google-chrome-stable = 91.0.4472.164-1
google-chrome-stable(x86-64) = 91.0.4472.164-1