[CentOS] libxml2 update/packaging issues?
Johnny Hughes
johnny at centos.orgMon Oct 25 14:36:19 UTC 2021
- Previous message: [CentOS] libxml2 update/packaging issues?
- Next message: [CentOS] FYI, Chrome no longer supported on Centos7.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 10/20/21 23:57, Simon Matter wrote: > Hi, > >> Hello all, >> >> last Friday (Oct 15) I encountered a weird issue relating to the >> libxml2* packages. >> >> I have a script which monitors the CentOS mirrors to find new packages. >> On Friday, these showed up: >> >> libxml2-2.9.1-6.el7.5.i686.rpm >> libxml2-2.9.1-6.el7.5.x86_64.rpm >> libxml2-devel-2.9.1-6.el7.5.i686.rpm >> libxml2-devel-2.9.1-6.el7.5.x86_64.rpm >> libxml2-python-2.9.1-6.el7.5.x86_64.rpm >> libxml2-static-2.9.1-6.el7.5.i686.rpm >> libxml2-static-2.9.1-6.el7.5.x86_64.rpm >> >> However, looking at Scientific Linux >> (https://scientificlinux.org/category/sl-errata/slsa-20213810-1/) >> and Red Hat Errata (https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:3810) it >> seems that CentOS is one release >> behind (el7.5 from CentOS vs. el7.6 for SL and RHEL). >> > > Yes, it seems the newest package has not been built from current GIT. > > What's also strange is that I see libxml2 two times, in > centos/7.9.2009/updates/x86_64/Packages/ and in > centos/7.9.2009/os/x86_64/Packages/. Both with identical version but > _different_ builds. > > Maybe some automated thing which went wrong? > Thanks for the report, this was fixed on 10/21
- Previous message: [CentOS] libxml2 update/packaging issues?
- Next message: [CentOS] FYI, Chrome no longer supported on Centos7.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list