> > On 2022-11-08 15:49, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 11/8/22 13:12, Simon Matter wrote: > > Is anyone else experiencing trouble with > kernel-3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64? > > I'm seeing a kernel panics in the kvm module on one of our VM hosts with > > it. > > I did notice a new libvirt update as well, but it seems to work fine with > > the > older kernel (.76.1). > > Where did you get the .80.1 kernel from? I'm a bit confused because I can > > only see .76.1 on my systems. > > Simon > > I'm actually running Scientific Linux, which seems to be a little ahead here. > > Probably not related, but vmlinuz-4.18.0-372.32.1.el8_6.x86_64 (AlmaLinux 8.6) had a kernel panic > on a Intel Xeon E5504 processor, but works fine on Xeon E56XX processors (5620 specifically in our > tests). * Believe from kernel version, the original email is for Centos 7, possible the same > change that went into the EL8 kernel went also to EL7 Triggered right after I used virsh start to > start the vm. (Caused Black Screen, and reboot. Found this in the crashed kernel logs on > /var/crash) Works fine on vmlinuz-4.18.0-372.26.1.el8_6.x86_64 and > vmlinuz-4.18.0-372.16.1.el8_6.x86_64 In fact, related - on our systems attempt to start qemu-kvm VM under kernel-3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64 freezes any of 5 workstations with dual E5507 (all worked OK under kernel-3.10.0-1160.76.1.el7.x86_64 and any previous version). The workstations with E5-2609, E5-2650 or E5-2630 are not affected - all of them run qemu-kvm VM under kernel-3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64 without problems. Any ideas? Regards, Petko -- Petko Alov Department of QSAR & Molecular Modelling Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, BAS 21 G. Bontchev Str 1113 Sofia, BULGARIA