On 1/29/23 05:49, Philip Wyett wrote: > On Sun, 2023-01-29 at 09:16 +0000, Philip Wyett wrote: >> On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 07:45 -0600, Bill Gee wrote: >>> On 1/26/23 20:25, Philip Wyett wrote: >>>> On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 13:16 -0600, Bill Gee wrote: >>>>> I have been running boinc client on CentOS7 hosts for some years. C7 is >>>>> getting close to end of life. Time to upgrade to C9 ... >>>>> >>>>> But I cannot find a package for the boinc client. "dnf search boinc" >>>>> returns nothing. >>>>> >>>>> I have enabled both EPEL and RPMFusion repositories. >>>>> >>>>> Is there a boinc client package for CentOS9 Stream? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> The client seems to have been built for EPEL 9 Next, but not as yet for EPEL 9. >>>> >>>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/boinc-client >>>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5978 >>>> >>>> You can file an issue for the package to be branched and built for EPEL9. >>>> >>>> [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/ >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Phil >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> CentOS mailing list >>>> CentOS at centos.org >>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >>> >>> Hmmmm...... I figured out a temporary work-around. I downloaded the >>> el8 rpm file from EPEL. It installed with no issues on CentOS9. >>> >>> I looked at turning in a bugzilla report. That requires having an >>> account at bugzilla. Nope, I do not need to add to the 400+ online >>> accounts I already have. Besides, there is no guarantee that the >>> package would be built in any reasonable time frame. It could be >>> months. I can wait a bit, but not that long. >>> >>> Is there a way to get dnf to install a "next" package? >>> >>> It has been a year since CentOS9 came out. The boinc-client package is >>> not yet ready for it. Is there any assurance that it ever will be >>> ready? Answer = no assurance whatever. >>> >>> In the worst case I will go to SOD ... Some Other Distribution. Fedora >>> 38 can be installed in a text-only mode to run headless, and it has a >>> currently maintained package for boinc-client. >>> >>> There are both Docker and flatpak packages for boinc-client. I have >>> never been able to get any Docker, flatpak or snap package to work >>> correctly, and it is even worse when trying to run them inside a virtual >>> machine. Those technologies seem to me to be an answer in search of a >>> non-existent question. >>> >>> Bill Gee >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CentOS mailing list >>> CentOS at centos.org >>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> >> Hi, >> >> I see what you mean and I made an error here. I should have checked bugzilla for the request to >> see >> if it already existed, which it does. >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092636 >> >> I have added a comment to the bug to see if it can be moved forward. >> >> Regards >> >> Phil >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS at centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > Hi, > > The ping comment on the bug report has be promptly dealt with by the maintainer and the build for > EPEL9 has now been done and will in 7 days work through testing and then drop into EPEL9 for all to > install. > > I hope this is OK for you and dispels the concerns with regards community and how responsive folks > within it are. > > Regards > > Phil > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Oh, very nice! Thank you Phil. I appreciate random acts of senseless kindness. :-) It will be interesting to see how dnf reacts when the el9 package for boinc goes live. Will dnf recognize it as an upgrade from the el8 package? I will let the group know what happens. Bill Gee