-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Aug 14 09:07, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 12/08/16 21:34, Brian Stinson wrote: > <snip> > > > > Did we land on an acceptable rate for this? We've exhausted the ready > > pool completely a few times today. > > > > One thing that might help is to work on the backoff in cicoclient. > > @David do your jobs sit in a holding pattern if the API returns 'out of > > nodes'? If so, we should peg the scheduled retry interval to our > > estimate of how long it takes the workers to fill out some machines. > > > > --Brian > > Another (possible) option is also to either : > - increase the number of workers on the CI infra sides Did this temporarily yesterday. > - have the workers job deploy in parallel mutiple nodes instead of just > one (actually the ansible job can deploy multiple nodes already in > parallel, but duffy limits the call to only one specific node per job) This is in the works, but will take some time to work it into duffy. > > -- > Fabian Arrotin > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab > - --Brian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXsJmaAAoJEIMGvNKzCweMwwMQAIZP1E93QFZn9hV84khCQD4Z 5A4csMwSWRc6VfgxJ9Xn/4XSgnwpuTSsodDe+pzox9wQhzy91QPO4wkRr+LuMkNY /S/uW/LXRbfQqQHY7c2R9GTBzr+P6nocLWod2UVYLdqxKwu0XnflSRVPLx9UhVZs UsVYwfFvCfH1BL8rcdxeQHZsDxxCDU/0+w7M8f/6wq2i0pnGp9egHJzOBU/Mb3pa xkQpq9nzY7LumjpgJI50ycxG0+NGA9N7antKzfct4ivqmhmqv2PZrZYXiY9hfAwR wKzEmzQWiRHu28NHOXsHnKDrIRVcA0JXPbBpjeQ7YpKXarxHM0ljNfGzhjoH8V6a fPjXHT4nn8JoXpbq9f/wim5mMP+wxlQEcRPwyQdojIpfTSQ+SXa9dvmwwRt0GdXF 4/t/ptfvfPXNPRlu/3IkmJPktPK+mO0JJ6J73aqVT6ZZwiFXlVRnNE2Sercp0zI4 U+v2PigaVk6y/44FdqC6Pv+1QraBTppGNyLfjKDCWJ3hP+xkBQQm3ZUXRLOwCRVE X5R1eIWqdiuBf3MkEOcB+NX83qmRIG/9xwA/9KHr0Tm1MAoybBUm2B/TuZEnMFry un6H58eMkANQuc4eirK1xqqALo3B31KXeqG+CEA/ud1j5t41kGLBNBsDjtA2YYZJ drByaxRm1DCaP6ZVK/UX =QAfA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----