Brian, I will test with that option on current centos jobs. Is it worth setting up a 2.0 stage environment to verify our jobs can load against it? Thanks, On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Brian Stinson <brian at bstinson.com> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > We're looking into upgrading ci.centos.org to the latest LTS release (In > the 2.x series). So far this appears to be completely > backwards-compatible with the set of plugins we have enabled, though we > will continue testing over the next few days. > > *JJB USERS READ HERE* > > If you use Jenkins Job Builder in your projects, can you please test > setting 'query_plugins_info=False' in your jjb.ini file and check for > adverse effects? We are still waiting on a fix in Jenkins to allow > regular users to access the plugin list, but in the meantime it appears > that there are only a few circumstances where this makes a difference. > > If all goes well, we will schedule a time and inform the list on our > plans for the upgrade itself. As always if you have any questions, > please let us know here. > > Cheers! > > -- > Brian Stinson > CentOS CI Infrastructure Team > _______________________________________________ > Ci-users mailing list > Ci-users at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users > -- -== @ri ==- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/ci-users/attachments/20160816/e9fba19b/attachment-0005.html>