[Ci-users] duffy node/get and inventory APIs returning FQDN hostnames

Vishwanath Bhat vbhat at redhat.com
Wed Feb 24 13:24:19 UTC 2016


On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 6:40 PM, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 24/02/16 10:57, Vishwanath Bhat wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 5:46 AM, Karanbir Singh
> > <mail-lists at karan.org <mailto:mail-lists at karan.org>> wrote:
> >
> > On 23/02/16 11:34, Vishwanath Bhat wrote:
> >
> >> Right now duffy apis like node/get and inventory gives us the
> >> hostnames and IP of the machines. But it gives short hostnames
> >> and not the resolvable FQDNs. It is a simple workaround to make
> >> it to FQDN. But still It would be good to have duffy return the
> >> resolvable FQDNs.
> >
> > have you looked at the cico client that David has been working on
> > ( https://github.com/dmsimard/python-cicoclient ), that would
> > abstract a lot of this away from your side.
> >
> >
> > Yes, I am using cico already. It returns short hostnames as
> > returned by duffy. Right now I have patched it to return FQDN.
> > Perhaps I will send a PR for this.
> >
> >
> > The /Inventory call, as its setup right now really needs a rethink
> > overall. But I'll take your point onboard and see if we can fix
> > this in the interim ( without breaking any of the other stuff ).
> >
> >
> > As I said, we have the simple workaround. But it would be good to
> > have duffy itself return the resolvable hostname.
> >
>
> Isn't that the case ? AFAIK (and as documented on
> https://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/CI/Duffy), duffy returns FQDNs and not
> shortnames (for API /Node/get calls) so I guess you mean only for the
> /Inventory part ?
>

Ah, Yes. My mistake. I apologise.

I was using cico to get nodes which was dumping in yaml format. So it's the
cico which dumps them in shortnames. But I just checked duffy Node/get API
and it returns the proper FQDNs. Apologies for the confusion caused.

Best Regards,
Vishwanath



>
>
> - --
> Fabian Arrotin
> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
> gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlbNq7QACgkQnVkHo1a+xU5DswCeODCtsSIsGWkm8Qh+F2ERexEY
> WGAAnA9Wr7EulRJYQAskDeJnFmnmPQwy
> =myBr
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Ci-users mailing list
> Ci-users at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/ci-users/attachments/20160224/f9452eca/attachment.html>


More information about the Ci-users mailing list