[Ci-users] Contents of Ci-users digest...

Gary Knutson knutson198734 at gmail.com
Mon Apr 10 09:58:21 UTC 2017


*Who the fuck are you, slut? Why you talking to my man Dustin Knutson ?*


*On Jan 26, 2017 7:00 AM, <ci-users-request at centos.org
<ci-users-request at centos.org>> wrote:*
















































































































































































































































































































































*Send Ci-users mailing list submissions to         ci-users at centos.org
<ci-users at centos.org> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
visit         https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users
<https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users> or, via email, send a
message with subject or body 'help' to         ci-users-request at centos.org
<ci-users-request at centos.org> You can reach the person managing the list at
        ci-users-owner at centos.org <ci-users-owner at centos.org> When
replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re:
Contents of Ci-users digest..." Today's Topics:    1. Ansible Update from
1.9.6 -> 2.X (Brian Stinson)    2. Re: Ansible Update from 1.9.6 -> 2.X
(David Moreau Simard)    3. Re: Ansible Update from 1.9.6 -> 2.X (Lauren?iu
P?ncescu)    4. Re: Ansible Update from 1.9.6 -> 2.X (Nigel Babu)    5. Re:
Ansible Update from 1.9.6 -> 2.X (Brian Stinson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:07:35 -0600 From: Brian Stinson
<brian at bstinson.com <brian at bstinson.com>> To: ci-users at centos.org
<ci-users at centos.org> Subject: [Ci-users] Ansible Update from 1.9.6 -> 2.X
Message-ID: <20170125170735.5wgzfsliclobz76m at ender.bstinson.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi Folks, We've been shipping
Ansible 1.9.x on the slaves for a while now. Do any of you have use-cases
to stay pinned to such an old version? We'd like to update at least to the
2.1 branch (2.2 has some templating/variable-quoting gotchas) in the near
future. Questions, comments? --Brian ------------------------------
Message: 2 Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 13:49:41 -0500 From: David Moreau Simard
<dms at redhat.com <dms at redhat.com>> To: Brian Stinson <brian at bstinson.com
<brian at bstinson.com>> Cc: ci-users at centos.org <ci-users at centos.org>
Subject: Re: [Ci-users] Ansible Update from 1.9.6 -> 2.X Message-ID:
  <CAH7C+PrXyUaZUBksYyoFc39v6Z7rGZ6iH_7cPMn_jS3umvWBaQ at mail.gmail.com
<CAH7C%2BPrXyUaZUBksYyoFc39v6Z7rGZ6iH_7cPMn_jS3umvWBaQ at mail.gmail.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Worth mentioning that 1.9.x and
2.0.x are officially unsupported and unmaintained [1]. [1]:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ansible-devel/6-6FdxZ94kc
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ansible-devel/6-6FdxZ94kc> David
Moreau Simard Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO dmsimard = [irc,
github, twitter] On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Brian Stinson
<brian at bstinson.com <brian at bstinson.com>> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > We've been
shipping Ansible 1.9.x on the slaves for a while now. Do any > of you have
use-cases to stay pinned to such an old version? > > We'd like to update at
least to the 2.1 branch (2.2 has some > templating/variable-quoting
gotchas) in the near future. > > Questions, comments? > > --Brian > >
_______________________________________________ > Ci-users mailing list >
Ci-users at centos.org <Ci-users at centos.org> >
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users
<https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users>
------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 20:16:02
+0100 From: Lauren?iu P?ncescu <lpancescu at gmail.com <lpancescu at gmail.com>>
To: ci-users at centos.org <ci-users at centos.org> Subject: Re: [Ci-users]
Ansible Update from 1.9.6 -> 2.X Message-ID:
<CAE9TcML8itpjPdjZdo+V+OPoW3SSoip5nn2PP+bNzYVKCeiY=A at mail.gmail.com
<A at mail.gmail.com>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I'm not using
Ansible inside CI yet, but I remember having had to adapt some 1.9
playbooks for 2.x. [1] Perhaps also worth mentioning, Ansible 2.2.1.0 fixed
CVE-2016-9587, CVE-2016-8647, CVE-2016-9587 and CVE-2016-8647 (the first is
about a compromised remote system being able to run commands on the Ansible
controller - I think 1.9 is also vulnerable [2]). Unless we can afford to
quickly backport such security fixes, wouldn't it be better to use the EPEL
version everywhere inside CentOS? Regards, Lauren?iu [1]
https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/porting_guide_2.0.html
<https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/porting_guide_2.0.html> [2]
https://lwn.net/Articles/711357/ <https://lwn.net/Articles/711357/> On Wed,
Jan 25, 2017 at 7:49 PM, David Moreau Simard <dms at redhat.com
<dms at redhat.com>> wrote: > Worth mentioning that 1.9.x and 2.0.x are
officially unsupported and > unmaintained [1]. > > [1]:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ansible-devel/6-6FdxZ94kc
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ansible-devel/6-6FdxZ94kc> > >
David Moreau Simard > Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO > > dmsimard
= [irc, github, twitter] > > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Brian
Stinson <brian at bstinson.com <brian at bstinson.com>> > wrote: > > Hi Folks, >
> > > We've been shipping Ansible 1.9.x on the slaves for a while now. Do
any > > of you have use-cases to stay pinned to such an old version? > > >
> We'd like to update at least to the 2.1 branch (2.2 has some > >
templating/variable-quoting gotchas) in the near future. > > > > Questions,
comments? > > > > --Brian > > > >
_______________________________________________ > > Ci-users mailing list >
> Ci-users at centos.org <Ci-users at centos.org> > >
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users
<https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users> >
_______________________________________________ > Ci-users mailing list >
Ci-users at centos.org <Ci-users at centos.org> >
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users
<https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users> > -------------- next
part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/ci-users/attachments/20170125/bb808059/attachment-0001.html
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/ci-users/attachments/20170125/bb808059/attachment-0001.html>>
------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:53:22
+0530 From: Nigel Babu <nigelb at redhat.com <nigelb at redhat.com>> To:
Lauren?iu P?ncescu <lpancescu at gmail.com <lpancescu at gmail.com>> Cc:
ci-users at centos.org <ci-users at centos.org> Subject: Re: [Ci-users] Ansible
Update from 1.9.6 -> 2.X Message-ID:
<CAF2NqgN2DUdY4A8o9sCk04C5Lk5xrywucVkdRkSYg2xm+E5_kg at mail.gmail.com
<CAF2NqgN2DUdY4A8o9sCk04C5Lk5xrywucVkdRkSYg2xm%2BE5_kg at mail.gmail.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I'm on the latest version via
virtualenv. I'd welcome having the latest version on the nodes by default.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Lauren?iu P?ncescu <lpancescu at gmail.com
<lpancescu at gmail.com>> wrote: > I'm not using Ansible inside CI yet, but I
remember having had to adapt > some 1.9 playbooks for 2.x. [1] > > Perhaps
also worth mentioning, Ansible 2.2.1.0 fixed CVE-2016-9587, >
CVE-2016-8647, CVE-2016-9587 and CVE-2016-8647 (the first is about a >
compromised remote system being able to run commands on the Ansible >
controller - I think 1.9 is also vulnerable [2]). Unless we can afford to >
quickly backport such security fixes, wouldn't it be better to use the EPEL
> version everywhere inside CentOS? > > Regards, > Lauren?iu > > [1]
https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/porting_guide_2.0.html
<https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/porting_guide_2.0.html> > [2]
https://lwn.net/Articles/711357/ <https://lwn.net/Articles/711357/> > > On
Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:49 PM, David Moreau Simard <dms at redhat.com
<dms at redhat.com>> > wrote: > >> Worth mentioning that 1.9.x and 2.0.x are
officially unsupported and >> unmaintained [1]. >> >> [1]:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ansible-devel/6-6FdxZ94kc
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ansible-devel/6-6FdxZ94kc> >> >>
David Moreau Simard >> Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO >> >>
dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter] >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:07
PM, Brian Stinson <brian at bstinson.com <brian at bstinson.com>> >> wrote: >> >
Hi Folks, >> > >> > We've been shipping Ansible 1.9.x on the slaves for a
while now. Do any >> > of you have use-cases to stay pinned to such an old
version? >> > >> > We'd like to update at least to the 2.1 branch (2.2 has
some >> > templating/variable-quoting gotchas) in the near future. >> > >>
> Questions, comments? >> > >> > --Brian >> > >> >
_______________________________________________ >> > Ci-users mailing list
>> > Ci-users at centos.org <Ci-users at centos.org> >> >
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users
<https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users> >>
_______________________________________________ >> Ci-users mailing list >>
Ci-users at centos.org <Ci-users at centos.org> >>
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users
<https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users> >> > > >
_______________________________________________ > Ci-users mailing list >
Ci-users at centos.org <Ci-users at centos.org> >
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users
<https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users> > > -- nigelb
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/ci-users/attachments/20170126/85e58518/attachment-0001.html
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/ci-users/attachments/20170126/85e58518/attachment-0001.html>>
------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 00:53:45
-0600 From: Brian Stinson <brian at bstinson.com <brian at bstinson.com>> To:
Lauren?iu P?ncescu <lpancescu at gmail.com <lpancescu at gmail.com>> Cc:
ci-users at centos.org <ci-users at centos.org> Subject: Re: [Ci-users] Ansible
Update from 1.9.6 -> 2.X Message-ID:
<20170126065345.k73x2nzlbsl3b3l3 at ender.bstinson.lan> Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8 On Jan 25 20:16, Lauren?iu P?ncescu wrote: > I'm
not using Ansible inside CI yet, but I remember having had to adapt > some
1.9 playbooks for 2.x. [1] > > Perhaps also worth mentioning, Ansible
2.2.1.0 fixed CVE-2016-9587, > CVE-2016-8647, CVE-2016-9587 and
CVE-2016-8647 (the first is about a > compromised remote system being able
to run commands on the Ansible > controller - I think 1.9 is also
vulnerable [2]). Unless we can afford to > quickly backport such security
fixes, wouldn't it be better to use the EPEL > version everywhere inside
CentOS? We'd be pretty happy to track the latest version. 1.9.6 was
temporary to enable a project or two that were in the middle of upgrading.
If we can get to 2.2.x I'm all for that. > > Regards, > Lauren?iu > > [1]
https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/porting_guide_2.0.html
<https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/porting_guide_2.0.html> > [2]
https://lwn.net/Articles/711357/ <https://lwn.net/Articles/711357/> > > On
Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:49 PM, David Moreau Simard <dms at redhat.com
<dms at redhat.com>> wrote: > > > Worth mentioning that 1.9.x and 2.0.x are
officially unsupported and > > unmaintained [1]. > > > > [1]:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ansible-devel/6-6FdxZ94kc
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ansible-devel/6-6FdxZ94kc> > > > >
David Moreau Simard > > Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO > > > >
dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter] > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:07
PM, Brian Stinson <brian at bstinson.com <brian at bstinson.com>> > > wrote: > >
> Hi Folks, > > > > > > We've been shipping Ansible 1.9.x on the slaves for
a while now. Do any > > > of you have use-cases to stay pinned to such an
old version? > > > > > > We'd like to update at least to the 2.1 branch
(2.2 has some > > > templating/variable-quoting gotchas) in the near
future. > > > > > > Questions, comments? > > > > > > --Brian > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ > > > Ci-users mailing list
> > > Ci-users at centos.org <Ci-users at centos.org> > > >
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users
<https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users> > >
_______________________________________________ > > Ci-users mailing list >
> Ci-users at centos.org <Ci-users at centos.org> > >
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users
<https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users> > > >
_______________________________________________ > Ci-users mailing list >
Ci-users at centos.org <Ci-users at centos.org> >
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users
<https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users>
------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________ Ci-users mailing list
Ci-users at centos.org <Ci-users at centos.org>
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users
<https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users>
------------------------------ End of Ci-users Digest, Vol 18, Issue 7
*************************************** *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/ci-users/attachments/20170410/fcb8962d/attachment.html>


More information about the Ci-users mailing list