[Ci-users] Duffy v2: Please send RFEs!
Karanbir Singh
mail-lists at karan.orgWed Aug 23 17:07:58 UTC 2017
- Previous message: [Ci-users] Duffy v2: Please send RFEs!
- Next message: [Ci-users] Duffy v2: Please send RFEs!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 23/08/17 08:57, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 09:36:04PM -0500, Brian Stinson wrote: >> On Aug 22 11:26, Niels de Vos wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 09:55:46PM -0500, Brian Stinson wrote: >>>> Hi Folks, >>>> >>>> You're likely familiar with our node provisioner Duffy >>>> (https://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/CI/Duffy). >>>> >>>> In order to support new features, and encourage interested folks to >>>> participate in development with us, we are gathering requirements to get >>>> started soon on Duffy Version 2. Duffy2 will be developed with an OSS >>>> license, and posted in a public repository. >>>> >>>> Some of you have pending RFEs that we'll deal with during development: >>>> - Support Fedora Images (https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13626) >>>> - Support for cloud VMs in cloud.ci.centos.org >>>> - Support for VLAN Isolation on the Seamicro hardware >>>> - Support for extending an existing session >>>> (https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=9773) >>>> >>>> If you have a feature request for us to track let's talk about it here. >>> >>> It would be helpful to have an option for keeping extras disks (or a >>> partition) available for free-to-use storage. This can help testing >>> features in Gluster (and probably Ceph) that require a block device. We >>> currently work around that with disk-images/losetup kind of approaches, >>> but it is definitely not how actual deployments are expected to be done. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Niels >> >> Would some proportion of free space in the primary volume group be >> sufficient for your needs, or do you need bare partitions? > > A bare partition would be better. For snapshots of Gluster volumes we > use LVM thin-provisioning and need to setup a VG for that. There is also > work in progress to support btrfs snapshots, and I dont think we should > place those on a PV either. > can be accomodated with something like an on-demand install / provision where you can parameterise the kickstart itself, but the flip side is ~ 5 min wait for the machine to become available. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
- Previous message: [Ci-users] Duffy v2: Please send RFEs!
- Next message: [Ci-users] Duffy v2: Please send RFEs!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CI-users mailing list