[Ci-users] ppc64le support in ci.centos.org is Released

Sat Aug 19 22:39:52 UTC 2017
Karanbir Singh <kbsingh at centos.org>

Happy to revisit

On 18 August 2017 22:21:39 BST, "Murilo Opsfelder Araújo" <muriloo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>On 08/11/2017 06:15 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Brian Stinson <brian at bstinson.com>
>wrote:
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> We've been working over the last few weeks on our node provisioner,
>>> duffy, so that jobs in CICO can request nodes for architectures
>besides
>>> x86_64.
>>>
>>> We have deployed that code into production and have some ppc64le VMs
>>> ready to take work. To see the flavors available including
>>> memory/vcpu/disk sizing, and to view sample duffy calls please
>visit:
>>>
>>> https://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/CI/Multiarch
>>>
>>> Potential Questions:
>>> --------------------
>>>
>>> - What about aarch64?
>>>
>>>   Support for aarch64 is coming as soon as we finish installing the
>>>   hardware for this (probably soon after the CentOS Linux 7.1708
>>>   release). We'll use the same pattern as ppc64le for the aarch64
>VMs.
>>>
>>> - Can I request nodes using cicoclient?
>>>
>>>   There is a pull request pending, a release announcement will
>follow
>>>   when this is merged.
>>>   https://github.com/CentOS/python-cicoclient/pull/14
>>>
>>>   The relevant documentation for making calls using cioclient is on
>the
>>>   wiki page.
>>>
>>> Multiarch Next Steps:
>>> ---------------------
>>>
>>> We plan on using these machines to begin exploring multiarch
>additions
>>> to openshift and openstack in ci.centos.org
>>>
>>>
>>> Happy Friday!
>> 
>> This is excellent news.  Thanks to all who worked on this!
>> 
>> josh
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ci-users mailing list
>> Ci-users at centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users
>> 
>
>That's absolutely a great achievement for the community!  Thanks to
>everyone involved on that!
>
>Now that ppc64le is available on ci.c.o, is it possible to get the
>following pull requests reviewed and possibly merged?
>
>https://github.com/CentOS/sig-cloud-instance-build/pull/95
>https://github.com/CentOS/sig-cloud-instance-build/pull/94
>https://github.com/CentOS/sig-core-t_docker/pull/2
>
>One pull is 9 months old.
>
>Josh, Brian, Karanbir - Are you able to help identifying the correct
>folks/SIGs to review those pulls?
>
>Thank you for the help!
>
>-- 
>Murilo

.#
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/ci-users/attachments/20170819/fd065585/attachment-0002.html>