On Aug 23 20:02, Murilo Opsfelder Araújo wrote: > On 08/22/2017 07:54 AM, Nigel Babu wrote: > > These are things I'd love to see fixed: > > > > * Request nodes in specific chasis, for instance, if we're trying to > > test performance and want a continuous baseline. > > * Given that Duffy v2 is going to be open source, is there going to be a > > tiny focus on someone who's not CentOS CI being able to deploy it? (I'm > > happy to be involved to do this) > > Automating the deployment of a Duffy server with Ansible would be nice too. This should be handled by the client side of the house, cicoclient: https://github.com/CentOS/python-cicoclient can provision using ansible, and we'll continue using cicoclient as our client reference implementation for duffy2. > > If Duffy server can be deployed on a distro-agnostic box, that'd be even > better. > > Talking about distros, is there any plan to provision/serve non-rpm > distros? My bet is no. I think that should be in mind just not to couple > things on rpm only. RPM distros are much easier for us, and we have enough folks requesting Fedora that I think we can consider doing that much. Would a 'bring-your-own-image' scenario to provision openstack VMs be sufficient for this case?