[Ci-users] Ansible Update from 1.9.6 -> 2.X

Nigel Babu nigelb at redhat.com
Thu Jan 26 04:23:22 UTC 2017


I'm on the latest version via virtualenv. I'd welcome having the latest
version on the nodes by default.

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Laurențiu Păncescu <lpancescu at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'm not using Ansible inside CI yet, but I remember having had to adapt
> some 1.9 playbooks for 2.x. [1]
>
> Perhaps also worth mentioning, Ansible 2.2.1.0 fixed CVE-2016-9587,
> CVE-2016-8647, CVE-2016-9587 and CVE-2016-8647 (the first is about a
> compromised remote system being able to run commands on the Ansible
> controller - I think 1.9 is also vulnerable [2]). Unless we can afford to
> quickly backport such security fixes, wouldn't it be better to use the EPEL
> version everywhere inside CentOS?
>
> Regards,
> Laurențiu
>
> [1] https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/porting_guide_2.0.html
> [2] https://lwn.net/Articles/711357/
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:49 PM, David Moreau Simard <dms at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Worth mentioning that 1.9.x and 2.0.x are officially unsupported and
>> unmaintained [1].
>>
>> [1]: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ansible-devel/6-6FdxZ94kc
>>
>> David Moreau Simard
>> Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO
>>
>> dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Brian Stinson <brian at bstinson.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Folks,
>> >
>> > We've been shipping Ansible 1.9.x on the slaves for a while now. Do any
>> > of you have use-cases to stay pinned to such an old version?
>> >
>> > We'd like to update at least to the 2.1 branch (2.2 has some
>> > templating/variable-quoting gotchas) in the near future.
>> >
>> > Questions, comments?
>> >
>> > --Brian
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Ci-users mailing list
>> > Ci-users at centos.org
>> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ci-users mailing list
>> Ci-users at centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ci-users mailing list
> Ci-users at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users
>
>


-- 
nigelb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/ci-users/attachments/20170126/85e58518/attachment.html>


More information about the Ci-users mailing list