[Ci-users] Ansible Update from 1.9.6 -> 2.X
Nigel Babu
nigelb at redhat.comThu Jan 26 04:23:22 UTC 2017
- Previous message: [Ci-users] Ansible Update from 1.9.6 -> 2.X
- Next message: [Ci-users] Ansible Update from 1.9.6 -> 2.X
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'm on the latest version via virtualenv. I'd welcome having the latest version on the nodes by default. On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Laurențiu Păncescu <lpancescu at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not using Ansible inside CI yet, but I remember having had to adapt > some 1.9 playbooks for 2.x. [1] > > Perhaps also worth mentioning, Ansible 2.2.1.0 fixed CVE-2016-9587, > CVE-2016-8647, CVE-2016-9587 and CVE-2016-8647 (the first is about a > compromised remote system being able to run commands on the Ansible > controller - I think 1.9 is also vulnerable [2]). Unless we can afford to > quickly backport such security fixes, wouldn't it be better to use the EPEL > version everywhere inside CentOS? > > Regards, > Laurențiu > > [1] https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/porting_guide_2.0.html > [2] https://lwn.net/Articles/711357/ > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:49 PM, David Moreau Simard <dms at redhat.com> > wrote: > >> Worth mentioning that 1.9.x and 2.0.x are officially unsupported and >> unmaintained [1]. >> >> [1]: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ansible-devel/6-6FdxZ94kc >> >> David Moreau Simard >> Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO >> >> dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter] >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Brian Stinson <brian at bstinson.com> >> wrote: >> > Hi Folks, >> > >> > We've been shipping Ansible 1.9.x on the slaves for a while now. Do any >> > of you have use-cases to stay pinned to such an old version? >> > >> > We'd like to update at least to the 2.1 branch (2.2 has some >> > templating/variable-quoting gotchas) in the near future. >> > >> > Questions, comments? >> > >> > --Brian >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Ci-users mailing list >> > Ci-users at centos.org >> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users >> _______________________________________________ >> Ci-users mailing list >> Ci-users at centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Ci-users mailing list > Ci-users at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users > > -- nigelb -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/ci-users/attachments/20170126/85e58518/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message: [Ci-users] Ansible Update from 1.9.6 -> 2.X
- Next message: [Ci-users] Ansible Update from 1.9.6 -> 2.X
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CI-users mailing list