On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 9:46 PM, Brian Stinson <brian at bstinson.com> wrote: > Will work through this with Ari in the next couple of days and report > back. > > Thanks Brian I am going to have the team see if we can move our workload to containers inside Openshift as well. I am just concerned we may run into limitations. Also we are syncing our results to artifacts.ci.centos so we would need to have access to that as well. > -- > Brian Stinson > brian at bstinson.com > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017, at 10:02, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > > > On 20/06/17 15:50, Ari LiVigni wrote: > > >> We are probably going to need this sooner then a couple of weeks since > > >> we want to run this in production soon. > > >> Is there anyway we can move this up in the backlog? We can try > running > > >> things on Openshift but I don't think that will work across the > board. > > > > is it possible to get some visibility into the job that is going to be > > run or even some arch diagrams around this ? > > > > We can get the duffy interface working from apps.ci pretty quickly, I > > would have thought. I suspect Brian is hoping to work through the entire > > end to end story in a few weeks time. > > > > Either way, getting some visibility into the intended flows would be > > great, so we end up solving the right problem first. > > > > regards > > > > -- > > Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project > > +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS > > GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc > > > > Email had 1 attachment: > > + signature.asc > > 1k (application/pgp-signature) > -- -== @ri ==- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/ci-users/attachments/20170620/6934c551/attachment-0005.html>