[Ci-users] More info on apps.ci.centos.org?

Thu Sep 28 20:50:49 UTC 2017
Ari LiVigni <alivigni at redhat.com>

I don't know if this is what you are looking for, but we already are doing
this without PAPR on PRs as part of the CI-Pipeline[1] in that same
Openshift environment.
We actually rebuild our own containers and validate them with our pipeline
code in a stage pipeline before they get rolled into production.[1]

Our master and slaves are already integrated into apps.ci.centos.org and
all the infrastructure and code is in[2]

I would like to avoid duplication of work if you guys are looking to the
same thing and understand is there something that PAPR has over what we are
currently doing for the ci-pipeline.
I would happy to discuss it with you in more detail.


[1] https://mojo.redhat.com/videos/934601
[2] https://github.com/CentOS-PaaS-SIG/ci-pipeline/

-== @ri ==-

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Colin Walters <walters at verbum.org> wrote:

> So apparently there's "apps.ci.centos.org" which
> is an OpenShift v3 cluster - is there any more information
> on this available?  I looked in
> https://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/CI
> but didn't see much.
> There's a lot of questions I have, but the main one
> is I'd like better hosting for https://github.com/projectatomic/papr
> which in particular includes our Homu instance that's
> critical path for several projectatomic repos - it gates our commits,
> so when it goes down, nothing goes into git.
> Would it make sense to host this in apps.ci.centos.org?
> _______________________________________________
> Ci-users mailing list
> Ci-users at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/ci-users/attachments/20170928/cab68c37/attachment-0002.html>