On Feb 16 16:46, Attila Darazs wrote: > Dear CentOS CI Team & CI users, > > We run quite a few jobs on the CentOS CI system and it's an essential part > for testing our libvirt deployment style of TripleO Quickstart. > > With the recent Jenkins security update our jobs broke[1] while requesting > nodes with the cico client. It was easy to fix, however it made us think > about the advantage of using a single job scheduler for all our testing. > > Upstream OpenStack infra is now completely based on Zuul v3[2] without > having Jenkins as a backend for running jobs. Soon the same thing is going > to happen to our rdoproject.org instance as the new version of > SoftwareFactory[3] contains the v3 version, and we're considering replacing > our downstream jobs with Zuul based ones as well. > > It would be an obvious advantage for us in the long term if we could unify > the way we handle job running and configuration through Zuul instead of > Jenkins. > > I just wanted to test the waters with regards to the CentOS CI team's > willingness to consider setting up an instance and the other users interest > in it. > > Please let me know what you think. > > Best regards, > Attila > > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1749845 > [2] https://docs.openstack.org/infra/zuul/ > [3] https://softwarefactory-project.io/docs/main_components.html > _______________________________________________ > Ci-users mailing list > Ci-users at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users At this point we're focusing our efforts in ci.centos.org on Jenkins. I don't want to discourage any PoC/exploratory work, but it's out of scope to do a large scale migration to another execution engine right now. --Brian