Attila, Coming from an Openshift perspective maybe you can help me understand how this works with kubernetes and containers? - Do you have a set of playbooks you run in Zuul to provision kube pods and containers as first class citizens? - Can I use containers maintained in Openshift and their lifecycle to run inside of Zuul to: - validate the container itself and tag it appropriately - use it as a worker to execute tests on other resources - Can I provision all kinds of different resources besides Openstack VMs? I would really like to see some of these questions answered. -== @ri ==- On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Brian Stinson <brian at bstinson.com> wrote: > On Feb 16 16:46, Attila Darazs wrote: > > Dear CentOS CI Team & CI users, > > > > We run quite a few jobs on the CentOS CI system and it's an essential > part > > for testing our libvirt deployment style of TripleO Quickstart. > > > > With the recent Jenkins security update our jobs broke[1] while > requesting > > nodes with the cico client. It was easy to fix, however it made us think > > about the advantage of using a single job scheduler for all our testing. > > > > Upstream OpenStack infra is now completely based on Zuul v3[2] without > > having Jenkins as a backend for running jobs. Soon the same thing is > going > > to happen to our rdoproject.org instance as the new version of > > SoftwareFactory[3] contains the v3 version, and we're considering > replacing > > our downstream jobs with Zuul based ones as well. > > > > It would be an obvious advantage for us in the long term if we could > unify > > the way we handle job running and configuration through Zuul instead of > > Jenkins. > > > > I just wanted to test the waters with regards to the CentOS CI team's > > willingness to consider setting up an instance and the other users > interest > > in it. > > > > Please let me know what you think. > > > > Best regards, > > Attila > > > > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1749845 > > [2] https://docs.openstack.org/infra/zuul/ > > [3] https://softwarefactory-project.io/docs/main_components.html > > _______________________________________________ > > Ci-users mailing list > > Ci-users at centos.org > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users > > At this point we're focusing our efforts in ci.centos.org on Jenkins. > > I don't want to discourage any PoC/exploratory work, but it's out of > scope to do a large scale migration to another execution engine right > now. > > --Brian > _______________________________________________ > Ci-users mailing list > Ci-users at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/ci-users/attachments/20180216/f595ec85/attachment-0003.html>