On 19/06/18 11:08, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 16/06/18 08:39, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> While investigating the hardware issue we had on one Seamicro chassis in >> the last days (see previous thread), we lost another one (completely at >> this point) during the night, so I have disabled all those ones too. (so >> that means 64 bare-metal nodes less in the pool) >> >> I'll create ticket with DC to see if that's possible to investigate the >> issue, and I'll keep the list informed about the status. >> >> Thanks for your comprehending, >> > > Just to let you know that we're still waiting on some input from DC > about that unreachable Seamicro chassis (Pufty) and so I can't even give > you any ETA on this. > > OTOH, we were able to get the previous chassis (Gusty) back online, and > I did some parallel reinstalls during the whole week-end and yesterday, > and it seems only one compute card (out of 64) has really a problem, so > that specific node/card is isolated now and I put that chassis back in > action in the duffy pool (so nodes were reinstalled, and I see some were > even deployed for some CI projects today already) > > More informations about the Pufty chassis when I'll have something to report > [update]That "Pufty" chassis is now back online, but under investigation. We're "stress-testing" it during week-end to see if it's working as it should (multiple reinstalls in parallels) and if that's ok, we'll add it back in the CI nodes pool Cheers, -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/ci-users/attachments/20180623/4cc31be4/attachment-0002.sig>