On 16/06/18 08:39, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > Hi guys, > > While investigating the hardware issue we had on one Seamicro chassis in > the last days (see previous thread), we lost another one (completely at > this point) during the night, so I have disabled all those ones too. (so > that means 64 bare-metal nodes less in the pool) > > I'll create ticket with DC to see if that's possible to investigate the > issue, and I'll keep the list informed about the status. > > Thanks for your comprehending, > Just to let you know that we're still waiting on some input from DC about that unreachable Seamicro chassis (Pufty) and so I can't even give you any ETA on this. OTOH, we were able to get the previous chassis (Gusty) back online, and I did some parallel reinstalls during the whole week-end and yesterday, and it seems only one compute card (out of 64) has really a problem, so that specific node/card is isolated now and I put that chassis back in action in the duffy pool (so nodes were reinstalled, and I see some were even deployed for some CI projects today already) More informations about the Pufty chassis when I'll have something to report -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/ci-users/attachments/20180619/04289e02/attachment-0003.sig>