On 11/07/2022 18:52, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 08:49:34AM -0300, Camila Granella wrote: >> *TL;DR: CentOS CI is going hardwareless and if you wish your project >> remains using it, we need your opt-in by August 2022. > > The Ceph-CSI project is a very happy user of the current CI > infrastructure, and we definitely wish to remain using it. We run a set > of jobs on a mix of bare-metal systems provided by Duffy and some > OpenShift native (containerized). > > With recent minikube versions we might be able to run inside a VM, > however we do require setting up a (minimal) Ceph cluster per job. The > VMs we run on bare-metal get extra disks for the backing storage. If > that is an option for the VMs we obtain through Duffy, we should be able > to adapt our jobs. > > Many thanks! > Niels > The EC2 VMs we'll provision will not get any extra disk[s] (not planned so far but we might reconsider and adapt as it should be easy). The other option is to ask for a bare-metal node to Duffy and you just continue to provision yourself VMs on top as you are doing right now. What do you think should match your needs ? -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_0xA25DBAFB17F3B7A1.asc Type: application/pgp-keys Size: 12767 bytes Desc: OpenPGP public key URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/ci-users/attachments/20220726/7dea6df0/attachment-0002.bin> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 840 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/ci-users/attachments/20220726/7dea6df0/attachment-0002.sig>