On 22/06/2022 18:45, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 5:39 PM František Šumšal <frantisek at sumsal.cz > <mailto:frantisek at sumsal.cz>> wrote: > > Hello! > > After reading & discussing the recent news regarding the move to > AWS, I wonder if it would be possible to provide Fedora Rawhide > images along with the C8S and C9S ones (and maybe active stable > Fedora releases as well). > > > Fedora Rawhide AWS images are available on Fedora's AWS account, that we > also use to test CentOS Stream: > > ❯ aws ec2 describe-images --filter > Name=name,Values="Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide*" | jq -r '.Images | .[] | > .Name' | sort | tail -4 > Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20220621.n.3.aarch64-hvm-us-east-2-gp2-0 > Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20220621.n.3.aarch64-hvm-us-east-2-standard-0 > Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20220621.n.3.x86_64-hvm-us-east-2-gp2-0 > Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20220621.n.3.x86_64-hvm-us-east-2-standard-0 > > This is what we use in Testing Farm <https://docs.testing-farm.io/>. Great, so we now know that they exist and we can investigate options to start deploying these .... > > > A bit of background: In the systemd project we have several jobs > with utilize Vagrant to run an Arch Linux VMs, in which we run tests > alongside the C8S/C9S jobs, to cover issues with the latest-ish > kernel and other software, and to also hunt down security issues > with the latest versions of ASan and UBSan. However, all this is > held together by a lot of duct tape and sheer will power, and in the > end it requires an EC2 Metal instance to run, due to the additional > level of virtualization. > > If we were able to provision Rawhide instances directly (which > should help us achieve the same goal as the Arch Linux VMs we > currently use), that could, in theory, allow us to drop the > requirement for Metal instances completely. > > > Do you need some direct access to AWS? We provide testing on AWS > instances as a service. Well .. you know that it's exactly what Duffy and newer CI infra would be doing , so overlapping solutions .. What I find amusing is that we now seem to have two solutions providing same thing, using the *same* AWS sponsored account, and with common projects ... -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_0xA25DBAFB17F3B7A1.asc Type: application/pgp-keys Size: 12767 bytes Desc: OpenPGP public key URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/ci-users/attachments/20220623/c4abdbc0/attachment.bin> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 840 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/ci-users/attachments/20220623/c4abdbc0/attachment.sig>