[CentOS-devel] C5: yum-metadata and non-yum yum-metadata
mail-lists at karan.org
Thu Mar 8 19:46:47 UTC 2007
seth vidal wrote:
>> I'm voting for #3, especially if it's something that could be accepted
>> upstream that won't break anything else.
> - except that we've already fixed yum 3.1.X for this problem.
> If you want to backport the patch from 3.1.x to 3.0.x that'd probably be
> in fact, it's probably what red hat has done, too.
I didnt know redhat had fixed this issue...
Based on early info, the fix seems to be just a 3 line patch. However,
I will go see what was done for 3.1.x
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq
More information about the CentOS-devel