[CentOS-devel] LiveCD development

Ned Slider ned at unixmail.co.uk
Wed May 6 12:28:59 UTC 2009


Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Patrice Guay wrote:
>> Creating to different LiveCD (official vs plus) does make sense. With 
>> the official LiveCD, you experience the equivalent CentOS release and 
>> see how your hardware is supported.
> 
> This pretty much follows what I was thinking as well, with one 
> difference. Lets not call it 'official' and 'plus'. The 'plus' name is 
> good, since it would reflect on the state of the media well, however the 
>    word 'official' is a bit misleading. Anything we put on 
> mirror.centos.org and announce publicly is 'official', wether its plus 
> or otherwise. Anyone have other recommendations for what it might be 
> called ? where it == livecd built from the distro only, using pkgs in 
> the distro only [1]
> 

Core or Base maybe?

Or just LiveCD and LiveCD-Plus (or whatever the "Plus" version is to be 
called)



More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list