[CentOS-devel] LiveCD development

Patrice Guay patrice.guay at nanotechnologies.qc.ca
Wed May 6 13:51:50 UTC 2009


Ned Slider wrote:
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> Patrice Guay wrote:
>>> Creating to different LiveCD (official vs plus) does make sense. With 
>>> the official LiveCD, you experience the equivalent CentOS release and 
>>> see how your hardware is supported.
>> This pretty much follows what I was thinking as well, with one 
>> difference. Lets not call it 'official' and 'plus'. The 'plus' name is 
>> good, since it would reflect on the state of the media well, however the 
>>    word 'official' is a bit misleading. Anything we put on 
>> mirror.centos.org and announce publicly is 'official', wether its plus 
>> or otherwise. Anyone have other recommendations for what it might be 
>> called ? where it == livecd built from the distro only, using pkgs in 
>> the distro only [1]
>>
>
> Core or Base maybe?
>
> Or just LiveCD and LiveCD-Plus (or whatever the "Plus" version is to be 
> called)

+1 to LiveCD vs LiveCD-Plus


More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list