[CentOS-devel] glibc x86_64 vs. i686 file conflict when building from sources

Karanbir Singh mail-lists at karan.org
Fri Nov 26 07:15:41 EST 2010


On 11/26/2010 07:38 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
>>> Which basicly means the thread was fine, until you got fed up with where
>>> it was going. Not sure why me mentioning the mock builds triggered you.
> I actually did, in fact I have read all the emails and usually refrain
> from replying when I have an opinion (given my past).

I suggest you read it again, because your 'which basicly means' is 
incorrect.

>> Or you should stop feeling so insecure and thinking everyone is out to
>> get you. I've almost always made requests to maintain sanity, not only
>> on this list but plenty of other places as well.
>
> I guess that's matter of opinion. The availability of recent mock packages
> for CentOS fits the centos-devel bill, just as the availability of
> kmod-packages for CentOS belongs on the general centos mailinglist.

Thats just bollocks. If every project was to announce every package in 
the main list, were looking at thousands of announcements there. You 
were repremanded after repeated spamming, not when you announced the 
efforts. And I am confident that we have been consistent with that 
policy over the years. Quite a few people have announced efforts and 
points of interest, its only when they digress into spamming have people 
objected.

- KB


More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list