[CentOS-devel] handling ABRT

Fabian Arrotin fabian.arrotin at arrfab.net
Fri Nov 26 14:27:03 EST 2010


Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 11/26/2010 07:19 PM, David Hrbá?? wrote:
>> I'd stick with bugzilla instance.
>> - upstream provides updates for abrt<->bz integration
>> - it's working now, we need only bz instance

Well, a second reading on David's post leads me to the conclusion that 
he wanted to report to bugzilla, but not upstream :-)

>> - no need for someone to track upstream and implement changes downstream
> 
> Not entire sure if upstream would be happy to have that in, and once we 
> release something - its quite hard to completely remove it from the wild.
> 
> I guess its a question we can ask
> 

If we could only redirect to something like bugzilla.centos.org (for the 
abrt stuff) instead of upstream's bugzilla, that would be fine. There 
would still be a process of sorting real bugs from that bz instance and 
report them in mantis and/or upstream too :/

-- 
--
Fabian Arrotin





More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list