[CentOS-devel] handling ABRT

David Hrbáč hrbac.conf at seznam.cz
Fri Nov 26 14:41:48 EST 2010


Dne 26.11.2010 20:27, Fabian Arrotin napsal(a):
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 11/26/2010 07:19 PM, David Hrbá?? wrote:
>>> I'd stick with bugzilla instance.
>>> - upstream provides updates for abrt<->bz integration
>>> - it's working now, we need only bz instance

Right.

> 
> Well, a second reading on David's post leads me to the conclusion that 
> he wanted to report to bugzilla, but not upstream :-)
> 
>>> - no need for someone to track upstream and implement changes downstream

I mean, once we are going to pluging/rewrite, we need someone to track
abrt upstream and propagate them into downstream/centos plugin. Also
there will be work with mantis upstream down to...

> If we could only redirect to something like bugzilla.centos.org (for the 
> abrt stuff) instead of upstream's bugzilla, that would be fine. There 
> would still be a process of sorting real bugs from that bz instance and 
> report them in mantis and/or upstream too :/
> 

Right.
DH


More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list