[CentOS-devel] handling ABRT
David Hrbáč
hrbac.conf at seznam.cz
Fri Nov 26 19:41:48 UTC 2010
Dne 26.11.2010 20:27, Fabian Arrotin napsal(a):
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 11/26/2010 07:19 PM, David Hrbá?? wrote:
>>> I'd stick with bugzilla instance.
>>> - upstream provides updates for abrt<->bz integration
>>> - it's working now, we need only bz instance
Right.
>
> Well, a second reading on David's post leads me to the conclusion that
> he wanted to report to bugzilla, but not upstream :-)
>
>>> - no need for someone to track upstream and implement changes downstream
I mean, once we are going to pluging/rewrite, we need someone to track
abrt upstream and propagate them into downstream/centos plugin. Also
there will be work with mantis upstream down to...
> If we could only redirect to something like bugzilla.centos.org (for the
> abrt stuff) instead of upstream's bugzilla, that would be fine. There
> would still be a process of sorting real bugs from that bz instance and
> report them in mantis and/or upstream too :/
>
Right.
DH
More information about the CentOS-devel
mailing list