[CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
dag at wieers.com
Thu Mar 24 09:07:37 UTC 2011
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
> On 03/23/2011 12:20 PM, Rainer Traut wrote:
>> Am 23.03.2011 11:09, schrieb Manuel Wolfshant:
>>> if you examine certain packages you will notice that there are linking
>>> differences between what SL ships and what RH ships.
>> Can you give an example of such package/binary?
> I can but I am not sure that I may. So I won't.
I don't see any reason why you may not share incompatibilities found in
Scientific Linux ? Can you shed a light on why that is ?
Other team members already disclosed two of those, so is there a reason
why not all of them are shared with the Scientific Linux team ?
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, info at dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
More information about the CentOS-devel