[Centos] Kernel for Pentium MMX

Mon Apr 26 13:46:39 UTC 2004
Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com>

On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 08:20, Lance Davis wrote:

> On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> 
> > No Problem ... do you want me to upload them somehow, or do you just
> > want to download them?
> 
> I will download them for now. I have just created a 'contrib' section , as 
> they are untested (by cAos team) and unsigned.
> 
> Can you post the srpm and/or specfile as well please.

The SRPMS file is posted ... all that I changed in the spec file is the
line

# groups of related archs
%define all_x86 i386 i686 athlon

to

# groups of related archs
%define all_x86 i386 i586 i686 athlon

Then rebuild the SRPMS file with:

rpmbuild -bs kernel-2.4.spec

Then build the i586 RPMS seperately like this:

rpmbuild --rebuild --target i586 kernel-2.4.21-9.0.3.EL.c0.src.rpm

There is another section, that I didn't change, which prevents the smp
kernel from being made for i586. Are there any dual Pentium (non-i686)
boards?  If so, you could remove the lines:

%ifarch i586
%define buildsmp 0
%endif

to get a i586 smp kernel as well.....


> 
> Regards
> Lance
> 
> > 
> > -Johnny Hughes
> > 
> > On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 08:09, Lance Davis wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Here is a link to a kernel and kernel-unsupported for i586 processors:
> > > > 
> > > > http://www.hughesjr.com/centos/
> > > > 
> > > > I built them by editing the kernel-2.4.21-9.0.3.EL.c0.src.rpm package
> > > > and edited the spec file to include the i586 target.
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > DISCLAIMER:
> > > > As I am not part of the CentOS devel team (and since these are not
> > > > included in RHEL), they are not official CentOS packages and are not
> > > > supported by the cAos or CentOS projects (or by me :-) ).
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > - Johnny Hughes
> > > 
> > > Do you mind if we mirror them in 'extras' ???
> > > 
> > > Regards
> > > Lance
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 06:29, Jakub Wojtanowski wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > But since most of packages are i386, why not include i586 Kernel as Tao
> > > > > Linux distro team did
> > > > > http://wopr.mind.ilstu.edu/taolinux/tao-1.0/updates/kernel-2.4.21-9.0.3.TL.i586.rpm
> > > > > 
> > > > > Best Regards
> > > > > Cooba
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > CentOS mailing list
> > > > > CentOS at caosity.org
> > > > > http://www.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> > > > 
> > 


-Johnny Hughes
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20040426/19720b1e/attachment-0005.html>