[CentOS] Wherefore whitebox?
Rodrigo Barbosa
rodrigob at suespammers.orgWed Oct 12 07:33:22 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Wherefore whitebox?
- Next message: [CentOS] Wherefore whitebox?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:10:25PM -0700, Benjamin Smith wrote: > My biggest concern with CentOS is that the > community here seems to want to be more than a recompile of RHEL. Nonsense. That is what we have Dag Wieers (and others) for, so we don't lack anything we need on CentOS :) []s - -- Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at suespammers.org> "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDTLxCpdyWzQ5b5ckRAhyEAKCOKx8RQqZ6OqnJQTImoK9kYLhaZACgr4sY QaCfTFaMjO3O5LH+8C7e+aM= =zeff -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: [CentOS] Wherefore whitebox?
- Next message: [CentOS] Wherefore whitebox?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list