[CentOS] Re: Rebuilding Raid 1
Mace Eliason
meliason at shaw.caTue May 2 05:49:21 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Rebuilding Raid 1
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Rebuilding Raid 1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yes they do I just left that out. It is almost done resyncing. I have a replacement drive that I want to sync after this is finished to remove the drive that had the problem to begin with. In this case sda I would assume that I would create the raid partitions on the new drive and then sync again something similar to what I have just done. Thanks so much for your help This server has been running for 2months with no problems and this is sure a learning experience for me. Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 00:21, Mace Eliason wrote: > >> Also I ran fdisk -l and this is what I got >> >> /dev/sda1 >> /dev/sda2 >> /dev/sda3 >> >> /dev/sdb1 >> /dev/sdb2 >> /dev/sdb3 >> >> disk /dev/md0: 106meg >> /dev/md0 doesn't contain a valid partion table >> >> disk /dev/md2: 15.9gig >> /dev/md2 doesn't contain a valid partion table >> >> disk /dev/md1: 2097meg >> /dev/md1 doesn't contain a valid partion table >> >> Does that help at all? >> > > I expected it to show the sizes of the sda/sdb partitions > but that was just a sanity check to make sure that the > corresponding partitions match. It's a fairly safe > assumption that they do. > >
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Rebuilding Raid 1
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Rebuilding Raid 1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list