[CentOS] CentOS 3 vs. CentOS 4 Memory Utilization
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Sat Feb 10 17:04:33 UTC 2007
William Warren wrote:
> yes i did. The 2.4x Rh kernels actually aren't right in their swapping
> behavior. it really nailed my samba server here at the house and caused
> massive swapping and load issues on a friend's gaming server. i don't
> know what it is about RH's 2.4x kernels but they swap and won't give the
> cache memory back. I have more than 6 ipcop firewalls based on 2.4
> kernels(not RH) and they won't swap unless you actually exhaust physical
> memory. The issue is the RH 2.4x kernels which for some reason continue
> to swap even with 500 MEGS of cache memory available to take back. 2.6x
> runs much better and actually obeys the swappiness commands. Even the
> various patches done by Rh on the 2.4x kernel never reduces this behavior.
I don't think I've seen that. Here is a 'top' from an RH7.3 box whose
uptime counter has rolled a couple of times so it has actually been
running several years.
10:57am up 317 days, 6:56, 6 users, load average: 0.07, 0.10, 0.09
213 processes: 210 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 1 stopped
CPU states: 5.1% user, 2.9% system, 0.0% nice, 91.8% idle
Mem: 2065404K av, 1988360K used, 77044K free, 0K shrd, 570124K buff
Swap: 1331128K av, 204848K used, 1126280K free 1158784K cached
That doesn't seem that bad and it's a 2.4.20-18.7 kernel. It's not very
busy now because it is a weekend. I never see a lot of swap-in
happening even when it is busy.
--
Les Mikesell
More information about the CentOS
mailing list