[CentOS] Re: Filesystem for Maildir
Scott Silva
ssilva at sgvwater.com
Tue Nov 27 18:48:05 UTC 2007
on 11/27/2007 10:41 AM Rodrigo Barbosa spake the following:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 11:28:58AM -0200, Heitor Augusto M Cardozo wrote:
>>>> - EXT3: reliable but very slow to read many small files.
>>>> - ReiserFS: best performance but unreliable and bad recovery tools.
>>>> - XFS: My choice, good performance and reliability.
>>> I would contest the last two.
>>>
>> I had two bad experiences with ReiserFS in our Mail Server, reiserfsck is
>> too slow and lost data.
>>
>> IMHO ReiserFS have the best performance for Maildir but its only safe on
>> production if you´re sure that the system I/O will never fail.
>
> nullfs (mount -t nullfs /dev/null /var/spool/mail) is even faster than
> ReiserFS, and is just slightly more likely to loose your data. :)
>
But it is way more predictable at WHEN it will lose data.
--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
More information about the CentOS
mailing list