[CentOS] FreeIPA

Craig White craigwhite at azapple.com
Wed Apr 8 05:23:17 UTC 2009


On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 00:06 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 23:42, Craig White <craigwhite at azapple.com> wrote:
> > Fedora 10 has 1.2.0 src
> > rpm but it has a requirement of popt-devel which I couldn't find for
> > CentOS-5.
> 
> CentOS5's "popt" package contains the development libraries and
> headers. rpm -ql popt shows that libpopt.a, libpopt.so and popt.h are
> there, so you should be able to safely remove that dependency from the
> specfile and build it from there.
----
you could be right. I checked on my Fedora system and the file list from
popt-devel seemed to have a lot more than just the popt on CentOS but I
didn't look at it all that closely. As I said, I just commented it out
(the dependency).
----
> > When I commented out the requirement for popt-devel in
> > the spec file, of course it wouldn't build anyway (ldapi-plugin-winsync
> > didn't seem to me to be related to popt-devel but who knows).  ;-(
> 
> Definitely not related.
> 
> Have you looked into the CentOS Directory Server instead?
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/DirectoryServerSetup
> 
> I don't know if that one contains all the components of FreeIPA, but
> at least the main ones should be there.
----
no, I haven't and I probably will. I wanted to play with freeipa because
I had a little time for experimenting. I typically use OpenLDAP but have
Fedora-DS running at a clients place. I think I like OpenLDAP more but I
would like Fedora-DS (or CentOS-DS) more if it were integrated with
kerberos, policy and audit.
----
> 
> > It would seem that if Red Hat were serious about freeipa, they would
> > make it so that it actually could build a non-ancient version on RHEL
> > (CentOS).
> 
> As usual, if you want cutting-edge it will be in Fedora. If you want
> stable it will be in RHEL/CentOS.
> 
> It seems to me that FreeIPA is a quite contained and integrated
> package, and it makes sense to have dedicated machines to run it. Why
> don't you just use FreeIPA itself instead of trying to shoehorn its
> packages into CentOS, ending up with something that will probably lack
> the advantages of both parts?
----
Sure but that's not typically the realm I play in. My typical client is
< 50 users and having a server just for authentication is harder to
justfiy.

I myself have an older server which doesn't support hardware
virtualization. Perhaps you're right, I set up something in
virtualization and use Fedora but the churn rate of Fedora is just too
much, especially for an authentication server.

Craig


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



More information about the CentOS mailing list