[CentOS] tinydns/djbdns opinion poll

Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
Thu Feb 12 21:04:15 UTC 2009


Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> James B. Byrne wrote on Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:31:39 -0500 (EST):
> 
>> I cannot answer whether this situation is still the case, and I know
>> that it was not always the case, but on the last but one update to
>> bind my configuration files were all renamed to .rpmsave and there
>> were no .rpmnew files created, only the default config files left in
>> place of the old ones.
> 
> Hm, when I installed bind last year for providing caching and some 
> internal name resolution in the LAN, it didn't install many config files. 
> I had to make up the main files by my own. What I did to get this setup 
> was to install bind, bind-chroot and caching-nameserver (and remove it 
> later as I saw I didn't need it). After that I saw at least two updates, 
> but no changes to config files.

You should only install the caching-nameserver package if you have no 
local DNS config.  The point of using it is that it supplies configs for 
caching-only operation.  Any bind install will do caching, but the 
others expect you to do your own configuration with local zones.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell at gmail.com



More information about the CentOS mailing list