[CentOS] Opinions on bonding modes?
Jonathan Moore
supermegatron at gmail.comMon Sep 14 16:04:39 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] Opinions on bonding modes?
- Next message: [CentOS] Opinions on bonding modes?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Rick Barnes <linux at sitevision.com> wrote: 8< > Since my switch *does* support 802.3ad, including layers 2,3 and 4 > hashing, should I use mode=4? Or would one of the other modes be > "better" for providing fail-over and link-aggregation, specifically > balance-tlb or balance-alb. Are you more interested in load balancing or fault tolerance? -jonathan
- Previous message: [CentOS] Opinions on bonding modes?
- Next message: [CentOS] Opinions on bonding modes?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list