[CentOS] FYI: Why is NFS slower on EL5 than EL4?
Ross Walker
rswwalker at gmail.comWed Sep 16 13:22:10 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] FYI: Why is NFS slower on EL5 than EL4?
- Next message: [CentOS] bind dns help?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sep 15, 2009, at 9:37 PM, Eugene Vilensky <evilensky at gmail.com> wrote: > >> For those who have wondered why NFS on EL5 is slower than on EL4 I >> provide these links for your edification. >> >> http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/docs/DOC-15355 > > This was introduced in 5.4 or 5.0 or somewhere between? > The time based scheduling was introduced in 5.0. Honestly even the quantum based scheduling in 4.0 had performance problems with kernel based threads, just less obvious. All kernel based IO should run under the same IO context, it doesn't make sense to have the kernel competing against itself. The only exception to that would be a RT kernel that might have a RT context that preempts even the kernel context. -Ross -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090916/69143dc0/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message: [CentOS] FYI: Why is NFS slower on EL5 than EL4?
- Next message: [CentOS] bind dns help?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list